A new NASA
study shows Earth's climate likely will continue to warm during this century on
track with previous estimates, despite the recent slowdown in the rate of global
warming.
This research hinges on a new and more detailed calculation of the
sensitivity of Earth's climate to the factors that cause it to change, such as
greenhouse gas emissions. Drew Shindell, a climatologist at NASA's Goddard
Institute for Space Studies in New York, found Earth is likely to experience
roughly 20 percent more warming than estimates that were largely based on
surface temperature observations during the past 150 years.
Shindell's paper on this research was published March 9 in the journal Nature
Climate Change.
Global temperatures have increased at a rate of 0.22 Fahrenheit (0.12
Celsius) per decade since 1951. But since 1998, the rate of warming has been
only 0.09 F (0.05 C) per decade -- even as atmospheric carbon dioxide continues
to rise at a rate similar to previous decades. Carbon dioxide is the most
significant greenhouse gas generated by humans.
Some recent research, aimed at fine-tuning long-term warming projections by
taking this slowdown into account, suggested Earth may be less sensitive to
greenhouse gas increases than previously thought. The Fifth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which was issued in 2013
and was the consensus report on the state of climate change science, also
reduced the lower range of Earth's potential for global warming.
To put a number to climate change, researchers calculate what is called
Earth's "transient climate response." This calculation determines how much
global temperatures will change as atmospheric carbon dioxide continues to
increase – at about 1 percent per year -- until the total amount of atmospheric
carbon dioxide has doubled. The estimates for transient climate response range
from near 2.52 F (1.4 C) offered by recent research, to the IPCC's estimate of
1.8 F (1.0 C). Shindell's study estimates a transient climate response of 3.06 F
(1.7 C), and determined it is unlikely values will be below 2.34 F (1.3 C).
Shindell's paper further focuses on improving our understanding of how
airborne particles, called aerosols, drive climate change in the Northern
Hemisphere. Aerosols are produced by both natural sources – such as volcanoes,
wildfire and sea spray – and sources such as manufacturing activities,
automobiles and energy production. Depending on their make-up, some aerosols
cause warming, while others create a cooling effect. In order to understand the
role played by carbon dioxide emissions in global warming, it is necessary to
account for the effects of atmospheric aerosols.
While multiple studies have shown the Northern Hemisphere plays a stronger
role than the Southern Hemisphere in transient climate change, this had not been
included in calculations of the effect of atmospheric aerosols on climate
sensitivity. Prior to Shindell's work, such calculations had assumed aerosol
impacts were uniform around the globe.
This difference means previous studies have underestimated the cooling effect
of aerosols. When corrected, the range of likely warming based on surface
temperature observations is in line with earlier estimates, despite the recent
slowdown.
One reason for the disproportionate influence of the Northern Hemisphere,
particularly as it pertains to the impact of aerosols, is that most man-made
aerosols are released from the more industrialized regions north of the equator.
Also, the vast majority of Earth's landmasses are in the Northern Hemisphere.
This furthers the effect of the Northern Hemisphere because land, snow and ice
adjust to atmospheric changes more quickly than the oceans of the world.
"Working on the IPCC, there was a lot of discussion of climate sensitivity
since it's so important for our future," said Shindell, who was lead author of
the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report's chapter on Anthropogenic and Natural
Radiative Forcing. "The conclusion was that the lower end of the expected
warming range was smaller than we thought before. That was a big discussion.
Yet, I kept thinking, we know the Northern Hemisphere has a disproportionate
effect, and some pollutants are unevenly distributed. But we don't take that
into account. I wanted to quantify how much the location mattered."
Shindell's climate sensitivity calculation suggests countries around the
world need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the higher end of proposed
emissions reduction ranges to avoid the most damaging consequences of climate
change. "I wish it weren't so," said Shindell, "but forewarned is
forearmed."
For more information about the Goddard Institute for Space Studies,
visit:
NASA
Guillermo GOnzalo Sánchez Achutegui
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Por favor deja tus opiniones, comentarios y/o sugerencias para que nosotros podamos mejorar cada día. Gracias !!!.