Download the high-resolution JPG version of the image. (303 KB)
Download the high-resolution JPG version of the image. (213 KB)
Download the high-resolution JPG version of the image. (651 KB)
Download the high-resolution JPG version of the image. (154 KB)
Download the high-resolution JPG version of the image. (384 KB)
In newscasts after intense wind and ice storms, damaged trees stand
out: snapped limbs, uprooted trunks, entire forests blown nearly flat.
In
a storm's wake, landowners, municipalities and state agencies are faced
with important financial and environmental decisions.
A study by Harvard University researchers, supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and published in the journal Ecology,
yields a surprising result: when it comes to the health of forests,
native plants and wildlife, the best management decision may be to do
nothing.
Salvage logging is a common response to modern storm
events in large woodlands. Acres of downed, leaning and broken trees are
cut and hauled away.
Landowners and towns financially recoup
with a sale of the damaged timber. But in a salvaged woodland landscape,
the forest's original growth and biodiversity, on which many animals
and ecological processes depend, is stripped away.
A thickly growing, early-successional forest made up of a few light-loving tree species develops in its place.
But what happens when wind-blown forests are left to their own devices?
The Ecology paper
reports results of a 20-year study at NSF's Harvard Forest Long-Term
Ecological Research (LTER) site in Massachusetts. Harvard Forest is one
of 26 such NSF LTER sites around the world in ecosystems from coral
reefs to deserts, grasslands to the polar regions.
"To manage
sustainable ecosystems, we must understand how they recover from
extreme, natural events, such as hurricanes, fires and floods," says
Matt Kane, a program director at NSF for LTER. "This process can take
decades. The NSF LTER program is uniquely able to support important
experiments at the time scales needed."
At Harvard Forest in 1990, a team of scientists recreated a major hurricane in a two-acre patch of mature oak forest.
Eighty
percent of the trees were flattened with a large winch and cable. Half
the trees died within three years, and the scientists left the dead and
damaged wood on the ground.
In the 20 years since, the researchers have monitored everything from soil chemistry to the density of leaves on the trees.
What they found is a remarkable story of recovery.
Initially,
the site was a nearly impassable jumble of downed trees. But surviving,
sprouting trees, along with many new seedlings of black birch and red
maple--species original to the forest--thrived amid the dead wood.
Although weedy invasive plants initially tried to colonize the area, few persisted for long.
"Leaving
a damaged forest intact means the original conditions recover more
readily," says David Foster, co-author of the paper and director of the
NSF Harvard Forest LTER site.
"Forests have been recovering from
natural processes like windstorms, fire and ice for millions of years.
What appears to us as devastation is actually, to a forest, a natural
and important state of affairs."
After severe tornadoes in
Massachusetts in June 2011, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Division
of Fisheries and Wildlife pursued a watch-and-wait policy at a site in
Southbridge, Mass.
There, salvage work is limited to providing access routes for public safety.
The
area is quickly regaining lush, native vegetation. It supports
everything from invertebrates to salamanders, and black bears that
winter in thick brush piles and forage for insects in rotting logs.
While
a range of economic, public safety and aesthetic reasons seems to
compel landowners to salvage storm-damaged trees, paper co-author Audrey
Barker-Plotkin of the Harvard Forest site suggests that improving
forest health should not be one of them.
"Although a blown-down forest appears chaotic," she says, "it is functioning as a forest and doesn't need us to clean it up."
-NSF-
Media Contacts
Cheryl Dybas, NSF (703) 292-7734 cdybas@nsf.gov
Clarisse Hart, NSF Harvard Forest LTER Site (978) 756-6157 hart3@fas.harvard.edu
Clarisse Hart, NSF Harvard Forest LTER Site (978) 756-6157 hart3@fas.harvard.edu
Related WebsitesNSF Long-Term Ecological Research Network: http://www.lternet.edu
NSF Harvard Forest LTER Site: http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/
NSF Discovery Article: The Colors of Fall: Are Autumn Reds and Golds Passing Us By?: http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=125511&org=NSF
NSF Harvard Forest LTER Site: http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/
NSF Discovery Article: The Colors of Fall: Are Autumn Reds and Golds Passing Us By?: http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=125511&org=NSF
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal
agency that supports fundamental research and education across all
fields of science and engineering. In fiscal year (FY) 2012, its budget
is $7.0 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly
2,000 colleges, universities and other institutions. Each year, NSF
receives over 50,000 competitive requests for funding, and makes about
11,000 new funding awards. NSF also awards nearly $420 million in
professional and service contracts yearly.
Useful NSF Web Sites:
NSF Home Page: http://www.nsf.gov
NSF News: http://www.nsf.gov/news/
For the News Media: http://www.nsf.gov/news/newsroom.jsp
Science and Engineering Statistics: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards Searches: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
NSF Home Page: http://www.nsf.gov
NSF News: http://www.nsf.gov/news/
For the News Media: http://www.nsf.gov/news/newsroom.jsp
Science and Engineering Statistics: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards Searches: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
The National Science Foundation (NSF)
Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui
ayabaca@hotmail.ccom
ayabaca@gmail.com
ayabaca@yahoo.com
Inscríbete en el Foro del blog y participa : A Vuelo De Un Quinde - El Foro!
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario