This is the remnant of Kepler's supernova, the famous explosion that was
discovered by Johannes Kepler in 1604. The red, green and blue colors
show low, intermediate and high energy X-rays observed with NASA’s
Chandra X-ray Observatory, and the star field is from the Digitized Sky
Survey.
As reported in our press release, a new study has used Chandra to identify what triggered this explosion. It had already been shown that the type of explosion was a so-called Type Ia supernova, the thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf star. These supernovas are important cosmic distance markers for tracking the accelerated expansion of the Universe.
However, there is an ongoing controversy about Type Ia supernovas. Are they caused by a white dwarf pulling so much material from a companion star that it becomes unstable and explodes? Or do they result from the merger of two white dwarfs?
The new Chandra analysis shows that the Kepler supernova was triggered by an interaction between a white dwarf and a red giant star. The crucial evidence from Chandra was a disk-shaped structure near the center of the remnant. The researchers interpret this X-ray emission to be caused by the collision between supernova debris and disk-shaped material that the giant star expelled before the explosion. Another possibility was that the structure is just debris from the explosion.
The disk structure seen by Chandra in X-rays is very similar in both shape and location to one observed in the infrared by the Spitzer Space Telescope. This composite image shows Spitzer data in pink and Chandra data from iron emission in blue. The disk structure is identified with a label.
This composite figure also shows a remarkably large and puzzling concentration of iron on one side of the center of the remnant but not the other. The authors speculate that the cause of this asymmetry might be the "shadow" in iron that was cast by the companion star, which blocked the ejection of material. Previously, theoretical work has suggested this shadowing is possible for Type Ia supernova remnants.
The authors also produced a video showing a simulation of the supernova explosion as it interacts with material expelled by the giant star companion. It was assumed that the bulk of this material was expelled in a disk-like structure, with a gas density that is ten times higher at the equator, running from left to right, than at the poles. This simulation was performed in two dimensions and then projected into three dimensions to give an image that can be compared with observations. The good agreement with observations supports their interpretation of the data.
These results were published online and in the February 10th, 2013 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/NCSU/M.Burkey et al; Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech
› Read more/access all images
› Chandra's Flickr photoset
As reported in our press release, a new study has used Chandra to identify what triggered this explosion. It had already been shown that the type of explosion was a so-called Type Ia supernova, the thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf star. These supernovas are important cosmic distance markers for tracking the accelerated expansion of the Universe.
However, there is an ongoing controversy about Type Ia supernovas. Are they caused by a white dwarf pulling so much material from a companion star that it becomes unstable and explodes? Or do they result from the merger of two white dwarfs?
The new Chandra analysis shows that the Kepler supernova was triggered by an interaction between a white dwarf and a red giant star. The crucial evidence from Chandra was a disk-shaped structure near the center of the remnant. The researchers interpret this X-ray emission to be caused by the collision between supernova debris and disk-shaped material that the giant star expelled before the explosion. Another possibility was that the structure is just debris from the explosion.
The disk structure seen by Chandra in X-rays is very similar in both shape and location to one observed in the infrared by the Spitzer Space Telescope. This composite image shows Spitzer data in pink and Chandra data from iron emission in blue. The disk structure is identified with a label.
This composite figure also shows a remarkably large and puzzling concentration of iron on one side of the center of the remnant but not the other. The authors speculate that the cause of this asymmetry might be the "shadow" in iron that was cast by the companion star, which blocked the ejection of material. Previously, theoretical work has suggested this shadowing is possible for Type Ia supernova remnants.
The authors also produced a video showing a simulation of the supernova explosion as it interacts with material expelled by the giant star companion. It was assumed that the bulk of this material was expelled in a disk-like structure, with a gas density that is ten times higher at the equator, running from left to right, than at the poles. This simulation was performed in two dimensions and then projected into three dimensions to give an image that can be compared with observations. The good agreement with observations supports their interpretation of the data.
These results were published online and in the February 10th, 2013 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/NCSU/M.Burkey et al; Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech
› Read more/access all images
› Chandra's Flickr photoset
- A long Chandra observation gives clues about the origin of the Kepler supernova remnant.
- Evidence points to the doomed white dwarf pulling material from a red giant star, not merging with another white dwarf.
- The explosion that created the Kepler supernova remnant was seen in 1604 by the object's namesake and many others.
This is the remnant of Kepler's supernova, the famous explosion that was discovered by Johannes Kepler in 1604. The red, green and blue colors show low, intermediate and high energy X-rays observed with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, and the star field is from the Digitized Sky Survey.
As reported in our press release, a new study has used Chandra to identify what triggered this explosion. It had already been shown that the type of explosion was a so-called Type Ia supernova, the thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf star. These supernovas are important cosmic distance markers for tracking the accelerated expansion of the Universe.
However, there is an ongoing controversy about Type Ia supernovas. Are they caused by a white dwarf pulling so much material from a companion star that it becomes unstable and explodes? Or do they result from the merger of two white dwarfs?
The new Chandra analysis shows that the Kepler supernova was triggered by an interaction between a white dwarf and a red giant star. The crucial evidence from Chandra was a disk-shaped structure near the center of the remnant. The researchers interpret this X-ray emission to be caused by the collision between supernova debris and disk-shaped material that the giant star expelled before the explosion. Another possibility was that the structure is just debris from the explosion.
The disk structure seen by Chandra in X-rays is very similar in both shape and location to one observed in the infrared by the Spitzer Space Telescope. This composite image shows Spitzer data in pink and Chandra data from iron emission in blue. The disk structure is identified with a label.
X-ray Image (Elements)
This composite figure also shows a remarkably large and puzzling concentration of iron
on one side of the center of the remnant but not the other. The authors
speculate that the cause of this asymmetry might be the "shadow" in
iron that was cast by the companion star, which blocked the ejection of
material. Previously, theoretical work has suggested this shadowing is
possible for Type Ia supernova remnants.
The authors also produced a video showing a simulation of the supernova explosion as it interacts with material expelled by the giant star companion. It was assumed that the bulk of this material was expelled in a disk-like structure, with a gas density that is ten times higher at the equator, running from left to right, than at the poles. This simulation was performed in two dimensions and then projected into three dimensions to give an image that can be compared with observations. The good agreement with observations supports their interpretation of the data.
These results were published online and in the February 10th, 2013 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
As reported in our press release, a new study has used Chandra to identify what triggered this explosion. It had already been shown that the type of explosion was a so-called Type Ia supernova, the thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf star. These supernovas are important cosmic distance markers for tracking the accelerated expansion of the Universe.
However, there is an ongoing controversy about Type Ia supernovas. Are they caused by a white dwarf pulling so much material from a companion star that it becomes unstable and explodes? Or do they result from the merger of two white dwarfs?
The new Chandra analysis shows that the Kepler supernova was triggered by an interaction between a white dwarf and a red giant star. The crucial evidence from Chandra was a disk-shaped structure near the center of the remnant. The researchers interpret this X-ray emission to be caused by the collision between supernova debris and disk-shaped material that the giant star expelled before the explosion. Another possibility was that the structure is just debris from the explosion.
The disk structure seen by Chandra in X-rays is very similar in both shape and location to one observed in the infrared by the Spitzer Space Telescope. This composite image shows Spitzer data in pink and Chandra data from iron emission in blue. The disk structure is identified with a label.
X-ray Image (Elements)
The authors also produced a video showing a simulation of the supernova explosion as it interacts with material expelled by the giant star companion. It was assumed that the bulk of this material was expelled in a disk-like structure, with a gas density that is ten times higher at the equator, running from left to right, than at the poles. This simulation was performed in two dimensions and then projected into three dimensions to give an image that can be compared with observations. The good agreement with observations supports their interpretation of the data.
These results were published online and in the February 10th, 2013 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
| Fast Facts for Kepler's Supernova Remnant: | |
| Credit | X-ray: NASA/CXC/NCSU/M.Burkey et al; Optical: DSS |
| Release Date | March 18, 2013 |
| Scale | Image is 12 arcmin across (45 light years) |
| Category | Supernovas & Supernova Remnants |
| Coordinates (J2000) | RA 17h 30m 40.80s | Dec -21° 29' 11.00" |
| Constellation | Ophiuchus |
| Observation Date | 6 pointings between April and July, 2006 |
| Observation Time | 205 hours 50 min (8 days 13 hours 50 min) |
| Obs. ID | 6714-6718, 7366 |
| Instrument | ACIS |
| Also Known As | SN 1604, G004.5+06.8, V 843 Ophiuchi |
| References | Burkey, M.T. et al, 2013, ApJ, 764, 63; arXiv:1212.4534 |
| Color Code | X-ray (Red, Green, Blue); Optical (Grayscale) |
Every 50 years or so, a massive star in our galaxy blows itself apart in a supernova explosion. Supernovas are one of the most violent events in the universe, and the force of the explosion generates a blinding flash of radiation, as well as shock waves analogous to sonic booms.
Supernovas were originally classified on the basis of their optical properties. Type II supernovas show conspicuous evidence for hydrogen in the expanding debris ejected in the explosion; Type Ia explosions do not. Recent research has led to a refinement of these types, and a classification in terms of the types of stars that give rise to supernovas. A Type II, as well as Type Ib and Type Ic explosion, is produced by the catastrophic collapse of the core of a massive star. A Type Ia supernova is produced by a sudden thermonuclear explosion that disintegrates a white dwarf star.
Type II supernovas occur in regions with lots of bright, young stars, such as the spiral arms of galaxies. They apparently do not occur in elliptical galaxies, which are dominated by old, low-mass stars. Since bright young stars are typically stars with masses greater than about 10 times the mass of the sun, this and other evidence led to the conclusion that Type II supernovae are produced by massive stars.
Some Type I supernovas show many of the characteristics of Type II supernovas. These supernovas, called Type Ib and Type Ic, apparently differ from Type II because they lost their outer hydrogen envelope prior to the explosion. The hydrogen envelope could have been lost by a vigorous outflow of matter prior to the explosion, or because it was pulled away by a companion star.
Core-collapse Supernovas
The general picture for Type II, Type Ib and Type Ic supernovas - also called core-collapse supernovas - goes something like this. When the nuclear power source at the center or core of a star is exhausted, the core collapses. In less than a second, a neutron star (or a black hole, if the star is extremely massive) is formed. The formation of a neutron star releases an enormous amount of energy in the form of neutrinos and heat, which reverses the implosion. All but the central neutron star is blown away at speeds in excess of 50 million kilometers per hour as a thermonuclear shock wave races through the now expanding stellar debris, fusing lighter elements into heavier ones and producing a brilliant visual outburst that can be as intense as the light of several billion Suns.
Illustration: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss
If, however, accretion of matter from a companion star or the merger with another white dwarf, push a white dwarf star over the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 solar masses, the temperature in the core of the white dwarf will rise, triggering explosive nuclear fusion reactions that release an enormous amount of energy. The star explodes in about ten seconds, leaving no remnant. The expanding cloud of ejecta glows brightly for many weeks as radioactive nickel produced in the explosion decays into cobalt and then iron.
Supernova 2001el (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab)
Pair-Instability Supernovas For extremely massive stars, another, even more violent type of supernova is possible. According to stellar evolution theory, temperatures rise to several billion degrees in the central regions of stars with masses between 140 and 260 suns. At these temperatures the usual process of converting mass into energy (E = mc2) by nuclear reactions is reversed, and energy is converted into mass in the form of pairs of electrons and antielectrons, or positrons.
The production of electron-positron pairs saps energy from the core of the star, disturbing the equilibrium between the outward push of pressure and the inward crush of gravity. This so-called "pair instability" causes violent pulsations that eject a large fraction of the outer layers of the star, and eventually disrupt the star completely in a thermonuclear explosion.
Pair-instability supernovas, if they exist, would be the most energetic thermonuclear explosions in the universe. In stars with masses greater than about 260 suns, the pulsations would be overwhelmed by gravity and the star would collapse to form a black hole without an explosion.
For stars with initial masses above about 200 suns, pair-instability supernovas would produce an abundance of radioactive nickel. Radioactive decay of this large mass of nickel into cobalt and other nuclei would feed energy into the expanding debris for several months, and create an ultra-bright supernova.
Observations with Chandra and optical telescopes indicate that Supernova 2006gy, the most luminous supernova ever recorded, may be a long-sought (40 years) pair-instability supernova.
The intense radiation emitted by a supernova lasts from several months to a few years before fading away. In the meantime, the rapidly expanding (millions of miles per hour) matter from the explosion eventually crashes into circumstellar gas. This collision creates a supernova remnant consisting of hot gas and high-energy particles that glow in radio through X-ray wavelengths for thousands of years.
The process of forming the remnant is somewhat like an extreme version of sonic booms produced by the supersonic motion of an airplane. Expanding stellar debris creates a shock wave that races ahead of the debris. This forward shock wave produces sudden, large changes in pressure and temperature behind the shock wave.
The forward shock wave also accelerates electrons and other charged particles to extremely high energies. Electrons spiraling around the magnetic field behind the shock wave produce radiation over a wide range of wavelengths. Radiation from supernova remnants is especially conspicuous at radio wavelengths, and radio telescopes have traditionally been the primary tools for discovering these objects.
In recent years, supernova remnants have also been discovered with focusing X-ray telescopes. The X-rays are produced by the forward shock wave and by a reverse shock wave that heats the debris, or ejecta, of the exploded star. The reverse shock is formed as the high pressure gas behind the forward shock wave expands and pushes back on the stellar ejecta.
A Chandra observation of the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A (Cas A) clearly shows both the outer shock wave and the debris heated by the reverse shock wave. The study of supernova remnants with radio, infrared, optical and X-ray telescopes enables astronomers to trace the progress of the shock waves and distribution of elements ejected in the explosion. These data are especially significant because supernovas are the primary means for seeding the galaxy with many elements such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon and iron that are necessary for planets and life.
Chandra image of Tycho's Supernova RemnantChandra's image of the Crab Nebula reveals rings and jets of high-energy particles that appear to have been flung outward over great distances from the neutron star. The diameter of the inner ring is about 1,000 times the diameter of our solar system.
Chandra has been able to detect numerous pulsars and their associated pulsar nebulas. These discoveries are proving to be one of the best ways to identify supernova remnants produced by the core collapse of a massive star, and to distinguish them from remnants produced by the thermonuclear disruption of a white dwarf star (Type Ia supernova).
Another method used to determine the origin of a particular remnant is to study the relative amounts of various elements, especially oxygen and iron. Core-collapse supernovas are rich in oxygen, whereas thermonuclear supernovas produce relatively more iron. The remnants of Tycho's and Kepler's supernovas are thought to have been produced by Type Ia supernovas.
J.D. Harrington, 202-358-0321
Headquarters, Washington
j.d.harrington@nasa.gov
Janet Anderson, 256-544-0034
Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala.
janet.l.anderson@nasa.gov
Megan Watzke 617-496-7998
Chandra X-ray Center, Cambridge, Mass.
mwatzke@cfa.harvard.edu
NASA
Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui
ayabaca@gmail.com
ayabaca@hotmail.com
ayabaca@yahoo.com
Inscríbete en el Foro del blog y participa : A Vuelo De Un Quinde - El Foro!
ayabaca@hotmail.com
ayabaca@yahoo.com
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario