Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Wolves. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Wolves. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 7 de septiembre de 2015

NSF : Understanding the ecological role of wolves in Yellowstone National Park.- Comprendiendo el papel ecológico de los lobos en el Parque Nacional de Yellowstone

Hola mis amigos: A VUELO DE UN QUINDE EL BLOG., hemos recibido información de la Fundación Nacional de Ciencias de Los Estados Unidos, sobre el estudio que ellos han efectuado;  sobre el valor ecológico que cumplen los lobos recién implantados en El Parque Nacional de Yellowstone
More information.......
http://search.usa.gov/search?affiliate=nsf&query=Wolves&x=0&y=0
http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/science_nation/wolfecology.jsp?WT.mc_id=USNSF_51
Study of predator-prey relationships in Yellowstone could contribute to predator conservation and management worldwide
Long loathed as a threat and nuisance, the wolf population in Yellowstone National Park was essentially wiped out by the mid 1920s. That changed in 1995, when the National Park Service reintroduced wolves there, with the goal of restoring a natural predator/prey dynamic to the landscape.
So, 20 years later, how has the park's ecosystem responded to the return of the wolves? That's just what Utah State University wildlife ecologist Dan MacNulty and his team want to find out.
With support from the National Science Foundation (NSF), and working in partnership with the National Park Service, MacNulty and his team are hot on the trail of the wolves' primary prey--elk. The team is following individually marked wolves and elk to determine how and why wolf-elk interactions fluctuate over time, the effects of these fluctuations on wolf traits and vital rates, and how wolves, grizzly bears and cougars interact to influence elk mortality rates. Fuller understanding of what's happening here could translate to better predator management decisions all over the globe.
The research in this episode was supported by NSF award #1245373, Collaborative Research: LTREB Renewal: Yellowstone wolves: their ecology and community consequences. LTREB is NSF's Long Term Research in Environmental Biology program.
a close-up image of a beaver
Wolves and Yellowstone. In the public mind, and in nature, the two are inextricably linked. Now, it turns out, they aren't alone on the ecological dance floor. Elk and willows play a critical role in wolves' success in the Yellowstone National Park ecosystem, willows serving as browse for elk--and elk as food for wolves. But there's another species involved, one that's instrumental to these well-choreographed steps: the beaver. Find out more in this discovery.
Credit: NPS
image of wolves hunting an elk in Yellowstone's deep winter snows
Once common in much of North America, Europe and parts of Asia, gray wolves now roam a comparatively tiny range. Worldwide, habitat loss and the effects of global warming threaten the long-term future for these icons of the wilderness. In the short-term, wolves must find enough ungulate prey like elk to weather the winter. The bigger the wolf, the better its ability to hunt and take down such prey. Or so it would seem. To find out whether larger body size in fact leads to better predator performance, ecologist Dan MacNulty of Utah State University along with other scientists studied whether wolves' size-related ability to handle prey might come at the expense of successfully pursuing that prey. Find out more in this discovery.
Credit: NPS/Dan Stahler
Related Links
The Division of Environmental Biology (DEB) of the Biological Sciences Directorate supports fundamental research on populations, species, communities and ecosystems. Scientific emphases range across many evolutionary and ecological patterns and processes at all spatial and temporal scales.
Dogs and wolves evolved from a common ancestor between 9,000 and 34,000 years ago, before humans transitioned to agricultural societies, according to an analysis of modern dog and wolf genomes from areas of the world thought to be centers of dog domestication.
Discovery
Yellowstone Ecosystem Needs Wolves and Willows, Elk and...Beavers?

Scientists plot crucial links among Yellowstone plant and animal species
Close up image of a beaver.
The missing link in the Yellowstone ecosystem? The beaver, scientists have found.
Credit and Larger Version
February 7, 2013
This article is the fifth in a series on NSF's Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) awards. Visit parts one, two, three, foursix, seven and eight.
Wolves and Yellowstone. In the public mind, and in nature, the two are inextricably linked.
Now, it turns out, they aren't alone on the ecological dance floor.
Elk and willows play a critical role in wolves' success in the Yellowstone National Park ecosystem, willows serving as browse for elk--and elk as food for wolves.
But there's another species involved, one that's instrumental to these well-choreographed steps: the beaver.
"Beavers are the missing piece in this ecosystem," says ecologist Tom Hobbs of Colorado State University (CSU) in Fort Collins.
No wolves, no beavers
The loss of wolves caused far-reaching changes in the Yellowstone ecosystem: more elk and fewer willows. With no willows to slow stream flow, creeks flowed faster and faster. Beavers prefer slow-moving waters, so they disappeared with the willows.
"Putting wolves back isn't enough to reverse the extensive changes caused by their long absence," says Hobbs, who, along with other scientists discovered in a decade-long research project.
The ecologists published results of their study this week in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. In addition to Hobbs, co-authors are Kristin Marshall, formerly of CSU and now of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and David Cooper of CSU. Marshall is the paper's lead author.
"This research illustrates the value of long-term ecological experiments to understanding how species interactions cascade through food webs to determine ecosystem resilience," says Alan Tessier, program director in the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Division of Environmental Biology, which funded the research.
"The results have immediate practical applications in restoring and protecting ecosystems such as that of Yellowstone."
Wolves aren't enough
Scientists had thought that the return of the wolf, leading to a cutback on elk numbers and willow browsing, was central to restoring the Yellowstone ecosystem. "But Yellowstone also needs beavers," says Hobbs.
That's why bringing back wolves didn't work to quickly restore the ecosystem, the researchers believe.
Wolves hunted elk and brought down numbers of these ungulates. But removing elk browsing wasn't enough for the willows. They needed the sluggish streams created by beavers. But the beavers were gone.
Streams: the missing link
Once, beavers had been abundant anywhere streams flowed through Yellowstone. And that was almost everywhere.
In the past, dams made by beavers were ubiquitous features of Yellowstone's stream network. A third of mainstream reaches show evidence of sediment deposition as a result of beaver dams, a process that's happened for millennia. That sediment offered willows a place to take root.
In the spring of 1921, scientist Edward Warren of the Roosevelt Wild Life Forest Experiment Station in Syracuse, N.Y., conducted a study of beavers in Yellowstone. Warren found beavers and their ponds scattered throughout the park.
Near the Elk Creek Bench Colony, for example, Warren spotted "a group of beaver ponds which present interesting features," he stated in a report published in the 1920s.
"The water supply is a small brook originating from springs in a boggy tract of several acres. The brook flows through a flat depression in a ridge, and it is in the swampy, springy ground just below the woods that most of the ponds are located."
It's a rare if not non-existent sight in Yellowstone today, especially on the park's northern range where Hobbs' team conducted its research.
"Excessive browsing of willows (by elk after wolves were gone) was implicated in the disappearance of beavers from streams during the 20th century," Marshall, Hobbs and Cooper write in their paper. "The loss of beaver ponds from the stream network...compressed the area of bare, moist substrate needed for willow establishment."
Yellowstone ecosystem questions: answered by beavers?
Restoring an ecologically complete ecosystem in Yellowstone requires the return of willows--and with them, beavers.
There's a clear threshold for ecosystem recovery. Willow stands must be more than 6 feet tall, the scientists found. That height is important, says Marshall. Then willows are beyond the reach of browsing elk, and can serve as seed sources for new young willows.
Once willows have returned, beavers will gnaw down a certain number of them to build dams. The dams will further slow stream flow, allowing yet more willows to grow.
The results offer new insights on the role of wolf-driven trophic cascades in the Yellowstone ecosystem, says Hobbs.
Trophic cascades like that in Yellowstone occur when predators--or the lack thereof--in an ecosystem change the abundance or alter traits of their prey, in turn affecting the next lower trophic level.
"The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone has contributed to improvements in the park's ecology, but clearly that ecology is a complicated one," says Marshall. "The take-home message is that we have to be careful not to remove predators in the first place."
-- 
Cheryl Dybas, NSF (703) 292-7734 cdybas@nsf.gov
Close up of willow branch and measuring tape
View Video
View a video of stream, willow, and beaver research in Yellowstone.
Credit and Larger Version
An old beaver dam along a stream in Yellowstone National Park.
A long-ago beaver dam, a rare sight today, along a stream in Yellowstone National Park.
Credit and Larger Version
Map showing locations of the project's experimental sites on Yellowstone's northern range.
Locations of the project's experimental sites on Yellowstone's northern range.
Credit and Larger Version
Summertime at the team's upstream research site along East Blacktail Deer Creek.
Summertime at the team's upstream research site along East Blacktail Deer Creek.
Credit and Larger Version
Snow covered East Blacktail Deer Creek
Snow covers East Blacktail Deer Creek in winter. Still, most browsing occurs then.
Credit and Larger Version
scientist Kristin Marshall measuring the diameters of browsed willow stems.
Using calipers, scientist Kristin Marshall measures the diameters of browsed willow stems.
Credit and Larger Versión
The National Science Foundation
Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui
Inscríbete en el Foro del blog y participa : A Vuelo De Un Quinde - El Foro!

jueves, 24 de abril de 2014

nsf.gov - National Science Foundation - Earth Week: Whither Yellowstone's willows and the streams they shade?


Yellowstone's water table dropping below riverbank willow trees
Willow catkin with dew in Yellowstone.
Willow catkin with dew in Yellowstone. Willows there and elsewhere depend upon a supply of water.
Credit and Larger Version
April 22, 2014
This article is the eighth in a series on NSF's Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) awards. Visit parts one, two, three, four, five, six, and seven.
Willows and streams. In Yellowstone, where there's one, the other isn't far behind.
On Earth Week, scientists are asking: How far do such connections reach?
New research on water-dependent willows shows that streams and willows may be conducting the music on Yellowstone's ecological dance floor.
Ecologists Tom Hobbs, Kristin Marshall and David Cooper published the results in a recent issue of the Journal of Ecology. Hobbs and Cooper are with Colorado State University (CSU) in Fort Collins, Marshall is at NOAA.
After wolves were extirpated from Yellowstone almost 100 years ago, elk multiplied, says Hobbs. The herbivores roamed across the landscape, nibbling willows to nubbins.
But the story doesn't end there.
With fewer willows to gnaw on, beavers began to decline. Crucially for willows, without the dams beavers build, which slow the flow of water, streams ran faster. Brooks soon became deeply carved into their banks from the force of rapidly-moving water.
Before long, the water table fell below the reach of streamside willows' roots.
Wolves and elk, beavers and willows: carefully choreographed parts
"All the possible interactions among plants and animals in nature are impossible to separately identify and measure," says Henry Gholz, program director in the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Division of Environmental Biology, which funds the Yellowstone willow research through its Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) Program.
"Yet scientists know these links are critical to the maintenance of functional ecosystems."
Over a 30-year-period, Hobbs and colleagues studied riparian willow (Salix spp.) establishment and stem growth. In Yellowstone's northern range, the scientists reconstructed willows' history from tree rings. The three-decade time-frame covered the reintroduction of wolves in 1995.
"What happens to willows is shaped more by how high the water table is," says Hobbs, "than by any other factor."
The finding shows how complicated ecosystem links can be, says Gholz. "The effects of elk browsing on streamside willows in Yellowstone over the past 30 years are related more to variations in year-to-year climate, age of the willow trees, and changes in streams due to declining numbers of beavers."
The scientists used climate variables such as annual precipitation, stream flow and growing season length; the abundance of herbivores (elk); and landscape elevation and an index of "topographic wetness" (how soggy the ground is) to predict willow growth before and after the reintroduction of wolves.
"Explaining variability in [willow] establishment required models with stream flow, annual precipitation and elk abundance," write the ecologists in their paper.
"The results show that changes in the growth of willows after the reintroduction of wolves," says Marshall, "can't be understood without considering all the variables."
Life as a willow: water required
Picture a willow as it leans over a river or stream. Willows, sallows and osiers form the genus Salix, made up of some 400 species of deciduous trees and shrubs. All are found on moist soils in cold and temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere.
Most are known as willows, but some narrow-leaved shrub species are called osiers, and broader-leaved species are referred to as sallows, from an Old English word derived from the Latin term salix.
Willows are the dominant riparian, or riverside, woody vegetation in Yellowstone and across the Rocky Mountains, according to Hobbs.
In Yellowstone, willows are found along rivers and streams, as well as near springs, seeps and anywhere water is available.
"As long as willows' roots can reach groundwater," says Hobbs, "the trees can survive--and withstand very high levels of browsing by elk. It all comes down to water."
On Earth Week and every week, the dance of life needs all the partners
Restoring an ecologically complete ecosystem in Yellowstone requires the return of willows--and with them, beavers, says Hobbs.
Once willows have returned, beavers will gnaw down a certain number of the trees to build dams. The dams will slow stream flow, allowing yet more willows to grow.
Willows, streams and beavers; wolves and elk. Willows and streams may have the first dance. But without them all, Yellowstone's ecological music will eventually fade away.
-- Cheryl Dybas, NSF (703) 292-7734 cdybas@nsf.gov
Investigators Fred Watson
David Cooper
Jennifer Hoeting
Matthew Kauffman
N. Thompson Hobbs
Related Institutions/Organizations Colorado State University
Total Grants $449,978
Related WebsitesNSF Discoveries in Long-Term Ecological Research:
 http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13083/nsf13083.pdf
Earth Week: The Search for White Gold - Snowmelt:
 http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=127580
Earth Day: Big Ecosystem Changes Viewed Through the Lens of Tiny Carnivorous Plants:
 http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=127651
Earth Week: A Stream Is a Stream Is a Stream: Or Is It?:
 http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=123855
On 'Earth Week,' World Is No Longer Our Oyster:
 http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=116767
It's Earth Week. Just In Time, Thousands of Hectares of Tropical Forest Are Saved:
 http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=119179
Earth Day in the future: What will it be like?:
 http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=130998&org=NSF
Earth Week: Bark beetles change Rocky Mountain stream flows, affect water quality:
 http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=130951&org=NSF
Elk browsing on willows in Yellowstone
Elk browsing on willows in Yellowstone; Do elk or does water limit the growth of willows?
Credit and Larger Version
old lake bed in Yellowstone covered with grass and willows growing along its wet edges.
An old lake bed in Yellowstone. Willows grow along its wet edges.
Credit and Larger Version
Two researchers with instruments working on Yellowstone's northern range clip willows
Researchers working on Yellowstone's northern range clip willows as part of the study.
Credit and Larger Version
profile of an elk
What is the true role of elk in Yellowstone's ecosystem?
Credit and Larger Version
An elk in a forest
At the center of Yellowstone: elk, willows, water, wolves--or all of them?
Credit and Larger Version
The National Science Foundation (NSF)
Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui

jueves, 1 de diciembre de 2011

SCIENCE: Study of Yellowstone Wolves Improves Ability to Predict Their Responses to Environmental Changes

Hi my Friends: A VUELO DE UN QUINDE EL BLOG., Methods developed in this study may ultimately improve predictions of wildlife responses to environmental changes in various ecosystems. Yellowstone wolves at play.
A study of the wolves of Yellowstone National Park recently improved predictions of how these animals will respond to environmental changes.
The study, which was partially funded by the National Science Foundation, appears in the Dec. 2, 2011 issue of Science.
Part of the Yellowstone Wolf Project, researchers tracked changes in various characteristics of wolves living in the national park between 1998 and 2009. They found some tracked characteristics--such as population size--are related to population ecology, while other tracked characteristics--such as coat color--are genetically determined through evolution.
The project also involved using a new model to compare data collected on Yellowstone wolf characteristics to environmental conditions through the years covered by the study. Researchers defined conditions in the park during each year of the study along a continuum from "good years" to "bad years"--with good years more favorable to wolf survival than bad years.
Tim Coulson of Imperial College London, the study's lead author, explains, "The novelty of the new model is that it looks at how the frequencies of changes in environmental conditions along the 'good to bad' year continuum simultaneously impact many wolf characteristics."
Study results indicate:
1.- Environmental changes will inevitably generate simultaneous ecological and evolutionary responses in the Yellowstone wolves.
2.- Changes in mean environment conditions will impact the size of the Yellowstone wolf population more than will changes in the variability of environmental conditions.
3.- A single environmental change may impact various wolf characteristics differently, depending on which particular aspects of wolf biology it impacts.
Researchers say to understand their conclusions, suppose environmental conditions in a "good year" helped increase the population size of Yellowstone wolves by increasing their survival rates. Also, suppose that a grey coat color would confer a survival advantage to wolves. Then, under those particular "good" conditions, an increase in the size of the wolf population would be expected to produce an increase in the prevalence of grey coats among the wolves.
By contrast, suppose that certain environmental conditions in a "good year" helped increase the population size of Yellowstone wolves by increasing the availability of their prey. Because the availability of prey and coat color are not related to one another, under those particular "good" conditions, an increase in the size of the wolf population would not be expected to produce an increase in the prevalence of grey coats among the wolves.
Coulson says increasing the specificity of the model's predictions requires collecting more data on the ecological and evolutionary responses of Yellowstone's wolves to various environmental conditions and on the relationships of these responses to one another.
As part of this effort, the Yellowstone Wolf Project research team currently is studying the differential impacts of various environmental changes on ecological and evolutionary characteristics of Yellowstone wolves during various stages of their life cycles. The team also is working to identify the types of environmental conditions--such as the sizes of various populations of prey species and the amount and residence time of snow on the ground--that define good, bad and intermediary years for wolves.
The researchers hope once the methods developed through this study are refined, they may be applicable to other types of species, such as insects or crop pests, that live in other types of ecosystems. What's more, Coulson suggests that these methods may ultimately help answer questions about human populations. As just one example, the methods developed through this study might ultimately be used to help predict the impacts of the ongoing obesity epidemic on survival and fertility rates and the resulting influence of those variables on the growth rate of selected human populations.
The National Science Foundation provided funding to all of this paper's co-authors: Daniel R. MacNulty of the University of Minnesota at St Paul, Daniel Stahler of the National Park Service, Bridgett vonHoldt of the University of California at Irvine, Robert K. Wayne of the University of California at Los Angeles and Douglas Smith of the National Park Service.
-NSF-
Useful NSF Web Sites:NSF Home Page: http://www.nsf.gov



Science and Engineering Statistics: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/

Awards Searches: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui
ayabaca@gmail.com



Mi lista de blogs